{"id":269,"date":"2013-03-20T11:57:42","date_gmt":"2013-03-20T11:57:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lawbulletin.wordpress.com\/?p=61"},"modified":"2013-03-20T11:57:42","modified_gmt":"2013-03-20T11:57:42","slug":"verwendung-eines-fotos-zu-werbezwecken","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/?p=269","title":{"rendered":"Verwendung eines Fotos zu Werbezwecken"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>OGH-Entscheidung: OGH 28. 11. 2012, 4 Ob 192\/12g<\/p>\n<p>Der OGH hat seine st\u00e4ndige Rechtsprechung erneut best\u00e4tigt, wonach die Verwendung des <strong>Bildnisses einer Person zu Werbezwecken <\/strong>einen Unterlassungsanspruch nach \u00a7 78 UrhG begr\u00fcndet, wenn der Abgebildete dadurch dem <strong>Verdacht <\/strong>ausgesetzt wird, er habe sein Bildnis <strong>entgeltlich <\/strong>f\u00fcr Werbezwecke zur Verf\u00fcgung gestellt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>OGH-Entscheidung: OGH 28. 11. 2012, 4 Ob 192\/12g Der OGH hat seine st\u00e4ndige Rechtsprechung erneut best\u00e4tigt, wonach die Verwendung des Bildnisses einer Person zu Werbezwecken einen Unterlassungsanspruch nach \u00a7 78 UrhG begr\u00fcndet, wenn der Abgebildete dadurch dem Verdacht ausgesetzt wird, er habe sein Bildnis entgeltlich f\u00fcr Werbezwecke zur Verf\u00fcgung gestellt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,1,13],"tags":[83,148,277,307,385,427],"class_list":["post-269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-persoenlichkeitsrechte","category-uncategorized","category-urheberrecht","tag-bildniss","tag-foto","tag-ogh","tag-recht-am-eigenen-bild","tag-urhg","tag-werbezwecke"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=269"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/media-law.at\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}